Showing posts with label Hastings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hastings. Show all posts

Monday, 7 February 2022

Stenton's William the Conqueror

William the Conqueror and the Rule of the Normans,

by Frank Merry Stenton.

1908 edition

From Project Gutenberg

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/59444

INTRODUCTION     1
 
CHAPTER I        THE MINORITY OF DUKE WILLIAM AND ITS RESULTS     63
 
CHAPTER II        REBELLION AND INVASION     96
 
CHAPTER III        THE CONQUEST OF MAINE AND THE BRETON WAR     126
 
CHAPTER IV        THE PROBLEM OF THE ENGLISH SUCCESSION     143
 
CHAPTER V        THE PRELIMINARIES OF THE CONQUEST
                                AND THE BATTLE OF HASTINGS     180
 
CHAPTER VI        FROM HASTINGS TO YORK     211
 
CHAPTER VII        THE DANISH INVASION AND ITS SEQUEL     267
 
CHAPTER VIII        THE CENTRAL YEARS OF THE ENGLISH REIGN     304
 
CHAPTER IX        THE LAST YEARS OF THE CONQUEROR     344
 
CHAPTER X        WILLIAM AND THE CHURCH     376
 
CHAPTER XI        ADMINISTRATION     407
 
CHAPTER XII    DOMESDAY BOOK     457
 
INDEX

 

Saturday, 8 January 2022

Master Wace: William the Bastard's Epiphany

According to Master Wace, William the Bastard was not celebrating Epiphany when news reached him from England regarding the death of Edward. One would assume that the same spy network that reported Harold’s ascension was also capable of reporting Edward’s illness and decline. But Wace, who was writing a hundred years later implies that William had no knowledge of events in England which is suspicious if he were the designated heir. Surely he would have been closely following the doings of the English court and been invited to the ceremonies surrounding the completion of the Edward’s greatest achievement, the cathedral containing his tomb.  But William was preparing to hunt. The story of William’s receipt of the news and his response is contained in the continuation of Chapter IX.


“The duke was in his park at Rouen. He held in his hand a bow, which he had strung and bent, making it ready for the arrow ; and he had given it into the hands of a page, for he was going forth, I believe, to the chace, and had with him many knights and pages and esquires, when behold! at the gate appeared a serjeant,who came journeying from England, and went straight to the duke and saluted him, and drew him on one side, and told  him privily that king Edward was dead, and that Harold was raised to be king.”

What follows next is Wace’s imaginative account of the Bastard’s dismay at receiving the news.

When the duke had listened to him, and learnt all the truth, how that Edward was dead, and Harold was made king, he became as a man enraged, and left the craft of the woods. Oft he tied his mantle, and oft he untied it again ; and spoke to no man, neither dared any man speak to him.
Then he crossed the Seine in his boat, and came to his hall, and entered therein ; and sat down at the end of a bench, shifting his place from time to time, covering his face with his mantle, and resting his head against a pillar. Thus he remained long, in deep thought, for no one dared speak to him ; but many asked aside, " What ails the duke, why makes he such bad cheer?
"

 William is comforted by his seneschal, William Fitz Osbern. The seneschal was the head steward of a medievil household. According to Wace, Fitz Osbern advised William not to try to conceal his embarassment, as the cat was already out of the bag regarding Harold’s treachery.

“Then behold in came his seneschal [William Fitz Osbern], who rode from the park on horseback; and he passed close by the duke, humming a tune as he went along the hall; and many came round him, asking how it came to pass that the duke was in  such plight. And he said to them,
" Ye will hear news, but press not for it out of season; news will  always spread some time or another, and he who gets it not fresh, has it old."
Then the duke raised himself up, and the seneschal said to him,
" Sire, sire, why do you conceal the news you have heard ? If men hear it not at one time, they will at another ; concealment will do you no good, nor will the telling of it do harm. What you keep so close, is by this time known all over the city; for men go through the streets telling, and all know, both great and small, that king Edward is dead, and that Harold is become king in his stead,  and possesses the realm."


Duke William confides in his steward and is advised by the home help to make an attack on England. There is no mention of Tostig, who is carefully written out of all William’s preparations. Fitz Osbern was later rewarded with the earldom of Hereford until his death in 1070.

"That indeed is the cause of my sorrow," said the duke, " but I know no help for it. I sorrow for Edward, and for his death, and for the wrong that Harold has done me. He has wronged me in taking the kingdom that was granted and promised to me, as he himself had sworn."
To these words Fitz Osber, the bold of heart, replied, " Sire, do not vex yourself, but bestir yourself for your redress ; that you may be revenged on Harold, who hath been so disloyal to you. If your courage fail not, the land shall not abide with him. Call together all that you can call ; cross the sea, and take the kingdom from him. A bold man should  begin nothing unless he pursue it to the end ; what  he begins he should carry through, or abandon it  without more ado.
"

In Edward’s Life, King Edward is reported as directing Harold to look after his Norman followers (see above). But Wace adds to Harold’s crime of perjury, the crime of persecution of the Normans remaining in England.

“Thus the fame of king Harold's act went through the country. William sent to him often, and reminded him of his oath; and Harold replied injuriously, that he would do nought for him, neither take his daughter, nor yield up the land. Then William sent him his defiance, but Harold always answered that he feared him nought.
The Normans who dwelt in England, who had wives and children there, men whom Edward had invited and endowed with castles and fiefs, Harold chased out of the  country, nor would he leave one there ; he drove  out fathers and mothers, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters.
”

Master Wace makes a major error when he reports that Harold was crowned at Easter rather than in January.  This is the first indication that he gives regarding the timing of the death of Edward and he is clearly ill informed. He makes further reference to the terms of Harold’s oath, in which he is well schooled, but he is lacking in actual facts regarding the succession.

“Harold received the crown at Easter; [Christmas] but it would  have been better for him if he had done otherwise, for he brought nought but evil on his heirs, and on all the land. He perjured himself for a kingdom, and that kingdom endured but little space ; to him it was a great loss, and it brought all his lineage to sorrow. He refused to take the duke's daughter to wife, he would neither give nor take according to his covenant, and heavily will he suffer for it; he,  and all he loves most.”

Friday, 17 December 2021

Bad Histories of the Norman Conquest

 


 In this video, Marc Morris reviews the lack of scholarship in three publications on 1066.  Whilst he covers a great deal of evidence revealing the shortcomings of these books, he by no means goes far enough. All three are exemplars of the poor standard of writing on the Norman Conquest and their authors' refusal to investigate or analyse the sources that they are using.  Almost exclusively, every book on 1066 tells the same story, one which can be traced back to Freeman and his bias. Freeman's racism observed by Morris, leads him to discount the saga sources for the period and the wealth of information that they bring to the table.  Morris's overview provides a good introduction into the problems of current publications on the subject.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ7upWC1_aI

 

Wednesday, 15 December 2021

Hastings: The location of Battle Abbey

 According to the Chronicle of Battle Abbey, there were two building sites for the Abbey. The first site is on the top of the hill at Battle where the Abbey currently stands. The second site is on ‘a lower place on the western side of the hill.” The Abbey was to be located on the battle field where King Harold fell, but the monks required a site more suitable for a monastery and its ancillary buildings and fields and which had access to a good water supply. Accordingly, when the builders arrived from Normandy they selected an alternate site. But this was not acceptable to King William who had made an oath and the Abbey was eventually completed at Battle, on the hill where Harold fell, according to his demands.   

The Chronicle texts.
https://archive.org/details/chronicleofbatte00batt

pp3-4
“while they were helping one another on with their armour, there was brought forth a coat of mail for the duke to put on, and by accident it was handed to him the wrong side foremost. Those who stood by and saw this, cursed it as an unfortunate omen, but the duke's sewer again bade them be of good cheer, and declared that this also was a token of good fortune, namely, that those things which had before kept their ground were about fully to submit them-selves to him. The duke, perfectly unmoved, put on the mail with a placid countenance, and uttered these memorable words
" I know, my dearest friends, that if I had any confidence in omens, I ought on no account to go to battle to-day ; but, committing myself trustfully to my Creator in every matter, I have given no heed to omens ; neither have I ever loved sorcerers. Wherefore, now, secure of His aid, and in order to strengthen the hands and courage of you, who for my sake are about to engage in this conflict, I make a Vow, that upon this place of battle I will found a suitable free Monastery, for the salvation of you all, and especially of those who fall ; and this I will do in honour of God and his saints, to the end that the servants of God may be succoured ; that even as I shall be enabled to acquire for myself a propitious asylum, so it may be freely offered to all my followers.””

p6
“Upon the hill where the Abbey now stands, the English supported their king in a compact body.”

p9
… At length the demands of his conscience from within, and the constant suggestions of the monk William Faber from without, prevailed, and the king acceded to his wish; and inasmuch as he was considered  a proper person, the king committed the erection of the work to him, and ordered him to fetch over certain brethren of his abbey, in order to found, on the field of battle, without further delay, an appropriate monastery. This he cheerfully undertook to do, and going at once to Marmoutier brought over to England four monks of great reputation and piety, namely, Theobald, surnamed Vetulus, William Coche, Robert of Bolonia, and Robert Blancard. These personages having viewed the scene of the battle, judged it an unsuitable site for so noble a building, but thought a lower place on the western side of the hill more eligible ; and there, not to seem remiss in their undertaking, they built some little dwellings. The place is to this day called Herst, and a certain thorn-tree growing there is a memorial of this circumstance.
 

The king on making careful enquiries as to the progress of the work, was told by the monks that the place where he had determined to build the abbey was situated upon a hill with a parched soil, dry, and destitute of water; and they entreated him that a more convenient spot in the immediate vicinity might be chosen for so important a work. Upon this the king grew angry, and commanded them with all haste to lay the foundations of the temple on the very place where he had achieved the victory over his enemy.
… Thus at length were laid the foundations of this most excellent work, as it was then considered ; and in accordance with the king's decree, they wisely erected the high altar upon the precise spot where the ensign of King Harold, which they call the Standard, was observed to fall.
”

The location of the second site has been identified as Crowhurst, and the thorn tree as the Crowhurst Yew which is believed to be in excess of 1500 years old.
see the video here:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6D55o0df58

However, Crowhurst is not on the western side of the hill at Battle and is nearly four miles away to the south on flat land. The Crowhurst Yew tree is adjacent to St George’s Church. Also close by are the ruins of the Crowhurst Manor House believed to have been built by Walter de Scotney in the 12th century.
In the video, there is a claim that the manor ruins are actually the second abbey site as mentioned in the Abbey Chronicle. Note that the Abbey Chronicle says that they built some ‘little dwellings’ at the alternate site, not that they commenced the abbey itself or constructed walls similar to those of the manor. Disregarding the fact that the Crowhurst site is four miles from Senlac Hill and that it is on flat land, not on a hill as described in all the other battle descriptions, there is also a claim that Crowhurst is the true site of the Battle of Hastings.

Wednesday, 8 December 2021

Florence of Worcester

The chronicle of Florence of Worcester with the two continuations;
by Florence, of Worcester, d. 1118

Published 1854
=======
 “The chronicle of Florence of Worcester with the two continuations; comprising annals of English history, from the departure of the Romans to the reign of Edward I.” 

Translated from the Latin with notes and illustrations  by Thomas Forrester,

by Florence, of Worcester, d. 1118; John, of Worcester, 12th century; Taxster, John de, d. 1265?; John, of Eversden, 13th century 

Publisher London H.G. Bohn


https://archive.org/details/chronicleofflore00flor/page/166/mode/2up

 There is much debate over how much of this chronicle was completed by Florence of Worcester and how much was completed by John of Worcester.

"The Chronicle of Florence of Worcester, so far as it relates to English history, with its two Continuations, embraces the period from the departure of the Romans in the year 446, to the twenty-third year of the reign of Edward I. in 1295. It is founded on an earlier Chronicle, compiled by Marianus Scotus, one of the many learned Irishmen sent forth from the "Island of Saints," between the sixth and eleventh centuries. ... The rest of his materials for the earlier period of English history are chiefly supplied by Bede, the Saxon Chronicle, the Lives of Saints, and Asser's Life of Alfred."

Tuesday, 7 December 2021

Queens of England Podcast - Strickland

 


The Lives of the Queens of England is a multi-volumed work attributed to Agnes Strickland, though it was mostly researched and written by her sister Elisabeth. These volumes give biographies of the queens of England from the Norman Conquest in 1066. Although by today's standards, it is not seen as a very scholarly work, the Stricklands used many sources that had not been used before.Volume one includes the biographies of Matilda of Flanders, Matilda of Scotland, Adelicia of Louvaine, Matilda of Boulogne and Eleanora of Aquitaine.(Introduction by Ann Boulais)

https://archive.org/details/podcast_lives-queens-england_417818002?tab=about

Matilda of Flanders was the wife of William the Bastard, her life in six parts. 

https://archive.org/details/podcast_lives-queens-england_417818002?tab=collection 

Monday, 6 December 2021

The Chronicle of Battel Abbey

 

The Chronicle of Battel Abbey, from 1066 to 1176,
now first translated with notes, and an abstract of the subsequent history of the establishment ;
by Battle Abbey,
translated by Mark Antony Lowell
publication date 1851

https://archive.org/details/chronicleofbatte00batt/mode/2up

The original is in the Cottonian Collection of Manuscripts in the British Museum (Domitian A ii). It is written on 129 leaves of vellum of a small quarto size, and is evidently of the latter part of the twelfth century.

The Bayeux Tapestry Elucidated

The Bayeux Tapestry Elucidated
by John Collingwood Bruce
Publication date  1856

https://archive.org/details/bayeuxtapestrye00brucgoog/page/n2/mode/2up


This book argues the case that the tapestry was made by Queen Matilda.

"One effect of the Conquest was to bring the people of England and Normandy into closer alliance than before. On the first  occasion on which William returned to Normandy, after the battle  of Hastings, he took with him, "in honourable attendance," a considerable number of the Saxon nobles, who were doubtless  accompanied by their wives and daughters. Assisted by English ladies, as well as by those of her own court, Matilda, the wife of  the Conqueror, probably at this time constructed the Tapestry which for many ages was preserved in the Cathedral of Bayeux.” p2

"Perhaps, however, we have acted rashly in having ventured even thus cursorily to touch upon the antiquity of the Tapestry. Miss Agnes Strickland, who, in her ‘Lives of the Queens of England’ shows how vigorously she can wield the pen, is rather indignant that any one who is not learned in cross-stitch, should  venture to discuss the subject. Before we argue, she wants to know if we can sew. She says, 'With due deference to the judgment of the lords of the creation on all subjects connected with policy and science, we venture to think that our learned friends, the archaeologists and antiquaries, would do well to direct their intellectual powers to more masculine objects of inquiry, and leave the question of the Bayeux Tapestry (with all other matters allied to needle-craft) to the decision of the ladies, to whose province it belongs. It is matter of doubt to us whether one, out of the many gentlemen who have disputed Matilda's claims to that work, if called upon to execute a copy of either of the figures on canvas, would know how to put in the first stitch.’ Few of the rougher sex would like to be put to the experimentum acus and therefore it may be as well at once to exercise the best part of valour, and beat a hasty retreat." p15

Saturday, 4 December 2021

The Saga of Edward the Confessor

 ICELANDIC SAGAS, Vol. III
THE ORKNEYINGERS SAGA
by George W. Dasent
[1894]
 
Appendix F: The Saga of Edward the Confessor
https://sacred-texts.com/neu/ice/is3/is324.htm

7  For that Harold, Godwin's son, was of great family in England, and a very proper man in himself, but the rulers of the land thought it hard to come under the rule of outlandish lords, then they took Harold to be king, and he was consecrated under the crown as the custom was of English chiefs.  In this design his brother Tosti had no share, but he was older, and so he thought himself nearer to the kingdom.  Then he went to meet his brother Harold and claimed to be even with him, but when Harold said "nay" to that, then he fared out of the land and fled to Denmark to find king Sweyn, Wolf's son, his kinsman, and bade him fare to England and win the land under his rule "as the Dane kings of old had done."  But Sweyn was not ready to do that.  Then Tosti fared north into Norway and egged on king Harold, Sigurd's son, to fare to England and win the land under him.  And that same summer those two, king Harold and Tosti, fared to England with a host and slew Morcar, Godwin's son, but earl Gurth his brother fled out of the battle.  But a few nights afterwards they fought at Stamford-bridge with king Harold Godwin's son, and there they both fell, Harold and Tosti, as is said in the annals of the kings of Norway.
 8         When William heard of the death of king Edward, and that Harold had let himself be chosen king in England, it liked him very ill, and he thought Harold had broken his oath and agreement with him;  then straightway he summoned all the chiefs he could get and a mighty host beside.  He made ready that force for England.  He came there just at the time when the two Harolds had fought.  Then he began to harry the land where he made the coast, and laid it under him wherever he went.  But when Harold, Godwin's son, heard that he fared against him, and their meeting was south by Helsingport, and either side had a very great host;  then earl Gurth spoke to his brother Harold and said, "I am afraid that it will not answer for thee to hold a battle against duke William because thou art bound by oaths to him, and thou hast sworn not to hold England against him."  King Harold answers, "May be brother thou art better fitted to fight with William, but I have not been wont to lie in a lair when other men have fought, and William the bastard shall not hear this that I dare not look him in the face."  After that king Harold made them set up his banner before him and went out to battle against William, and there was the greatest battle, and it seemed uncertain a long time which side would win the victory.  But as the fight went on the loss of men turned on the English side, and a great host fell there, and all fled who chose life.  There fell king Harold and his brother Gurth, but Valtheof their brother fled out of the fight.  William the bastard caused him to be burnt afterwards in a wood, and a hundred men with him.

Friday, 3 December 2021

Time Team Hastings Special

 

Time Team S20 Special 1066 The Lost Battlefield

 
 

Time team digs at Battle Abbey and on Caldbec Hill and go roundabout.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm-gARMbWiA

 

Wednesday, 1 December 2021

Battle Of Hastings: Secrets Of The 1066 Conquest | Dan Snow's Norman Walks


 Perhaps the most famous battle in British history is the defeat at Hastings in 1066, when William the Conquerer's Norman forces took victory on the British south coast. Historian Dan Snow puts his walking boots on and sets off to see what the British landscape can teach us about this fascinating battle

Master Wace, The Chronicle of the Norman Conquest from the Roman de Rou

 

 

 

Master Wace, His Chronicle of the Norman Conquest From the Roman De Rou by Wace

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/41163

 "Then it was that an arrow, that had been thus shot upwards, struck Harold above his right eye, and put it out. In his agony he drew the arrow and threw it away, breaking it with his hands: and the pain to his head was so great, that he leaned upon his shield. So the English were wont to say, and still say to the French, that the arrow was well shot which was so sent up against their king; and that the archer won them great glory, who thus put out Harold's eye."

Saturday, 27 November 2021

Baudri, Abbot of Bourgueil, Adelae Comitissae

 Baudri's poem begins:-

"Baudri sends his poem to look at the royal chamber and to please the illustrious countess, to greet her saying “hail countess, worthy rather of the name of queen.” She is the daughter of a king who was born a count but conquered the invincible Angles, who beat down the Normans with iron when they tried to interfere with his paternal rights and united the two shores of the channel. His generosity surpassed emperors’ but his wealth was immeasurable. Her mother too descends from a powerful and noble family of Flanders. The queen adorned the king, the king the queen. And their daughter is no less in virtue than her father, though she does not bear arms, which she would do if custom did not inhibit it, but she surpasses her father in her appreciation of poetry and her knowledge of books."

The description of the poem says:-

'Baudril was abbot of the abbey of Saint-Pierre de Bourgueil in Anjou from 1079 to 1106. About 1100 he wrote a poem, known as the Adelae Comitissae for Adèle, Countess of Blois and daughter of William the Conqueror, in which he describes a tapestry illustrating the events of the Norman conquest of England hanging near her bed.'

Within his poem, Baudri admits that his description is a flight of fantasy, his imagined account of a room worthy of the daughter of a king.

"Behold how my pages created a chamber for you and what care was taken to praise you. Surely such a chamber is fitting for such a countess and I described what would be most appropriate more than what existed."

He imagines tapestry scenes for each of the four walls, the ceiling and floor. Around her bed he places a fictional tapestry which is often identified with the Bayeux Tapestry. 

The poem's description is cited by English Heritage as one of six 'leading sources' for the battle of Hastings.

"Although there is no eyewitness account of the Battle of Hastings, there are six leading sources which have been regarded as contemporary and, in all but two cases, independent: the Gesta Willelmi Ducis Normannorum et Regis Anglorum by William of Poitiers, Archdeacon of Lisieux; a poem by Baudri, Abbot of Bourgueil addressed to William's daughter Adela; a poem on the battle attributed to Guy, Bishop of Amiens; the Anglo Saxon Chronicle; William of Jumièges Gesta Normannorum Ducum; and, of course, the Bayeux Tapestry."

But what does the poem actually say and can it really be utilised as a source for the battle if the author himself admits that it is fictional? It says:-

"... around her bed the conquest of England, William’s claims to the throne as Edward’s chosen successor, the comet, the Norman council and preparations, the fleet, the battle of Hastings with the feigned flight of the Normans and the real one of the English, and the death of Harold."

 And that is all it says.


Sunday, 21 November 2021

Vita Haroldi: The Life of Harold

Vita Haroldi. The romance of the life of Harold, king of England.
From the unique manuscript in the British museum
Mss. (Harleian 3776);
Edited by Birch, Walter de Gray, 1842-1924,
Publication date    1885 

https://archive.org/details/vitaharoldiroma00musegoog/page/n134/mode/2up

Introduction page ix
Of the authorship of this early tale (whether true or legendary we may never know) nothing is known for certain. Internal evidences point to the probability that it was composed about a hundred and ftfty years after the battle of Hastings. Sir Thomas Duffus Hardy (whose account of the Codex is given in his " Descriptive Catalogue of Manuscripts relating to the Early History of Great Britain,” vol. i., pp. 668-671) states that in his opinion “there is probably some truth in this curious narrative, but its errors are great and numerous. It is, however, known from good evidence that there was a report in circulation at an early period that Harold had escaped from the slaughter at Hastings.”